-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
- May 2023
- April 2022
- March 2022
- August 2021
- July 2021
- February 2020
- August 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- February 2019
- June 2018
- May 2018
- February 2018
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- February 2017
- August 2016
- June 2016
- February 2016
- March 2015
- February 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- March 2014
- December 2012
- July 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- November 2010
- March 2009
- February 2009
- December 2008
- June 2006
Categories
Meta
Category Archives: Nemesysco and the LVA-technology
Two weeks ago I had the pleasure of listening to Robert J. Lefkowitz‘s Nobel lecture at Stockholm University, in connection with the 2012’s Nobel Prize in Chemistry that he shared with Brian K. Kobilka. Robert J. Lefkowitz is affiliated with … Continue reading
Study in progress: Why do people believe in pseudoscientific voice-based emotion analyses?
Mayew & Venkatachalam’s recent article on “The Power of Voice…” (Mayew & Venkatachalam, 2012) shows that academics are not immune to the fallacies of pseudoscience. This is a potential problem because academics may end up endorsing bogus technologies that, if … Continue reading
Posted in Nemesysco and the LVA-technology
Tagged emotion analysis, journal of finance
Leave a comment
Les Liaisons Dangereuses: Is finance research flirting with pseudoscience?
Open lecture at The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. For further information check the Academy’s event calendar at: http://www.kva.se/sv/Kalendariumlista/Event/?eventId=393 Welcome!
Further discussion of the Mayew and Venkatachalam’s JF paper, “The Power of Voice”…
…can be followed on the Economics Job Market Rumors thread posted at: http://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/another-flawed-jf-paper The following blog (posted by Ministry of Truth) presents an excellent discussion of why researchers from the world of finance may have been trapped by LVA’s pseudoscientific technology: http://www.ministryoftruth.me.uk/2012/02/08/nemesyscos-lva-technology-ghosts-in-the-noise/
Posted in Nemesysco and the LVA-technology
Tagged LVA-technology, Mayew, Money Talks, Power of Voice, Venkatachalam
Leave a comment
Money Talks: The Power of Voice — Comment on William J. Mayew and Mohan Venkatachalam’s reply
Nemesysco’s claims are the real problem Nemesysco’s LVA technology has no plausible scientific bases. This is not new but it is the real problem and it cannot be settled by arguing from correlations. It has to be addressed in principle, … Continue reading
LVA voice analysis technology – A threat to the credibility of academic financial studies
Hobson, Mayew and Venkatachalam’s paper, Analyzing Speech to Detect Financial Misreporting, is just the last of a series of flawed studies by Mayew and Venkatachalam. The authors insist in using Nemesysco’s LVA technology and give the impression that this is as an emerging … Continue reading
The Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) drops Voice Risk Analysis (VRA) based on LVA-technology
The Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) dropped last week their interest on the Voice Risk Analysis (VRA), based on Nemesysco’s Layerd Voice Analysis (LVA) technology. After extensive tests of Voice Risk Analysis the DWP stated that ”From our findings … Continue reading
LVA-technology and Nemesysco’s official statement
Two documents relating to the ongoing debate on Nemesysco’s technology and its validity: The first is a contribution to the discussion of technical aspects behind the technology, “LVA-technology: A short analysis of a lie”. I discuss the shortcomings of the … Continue reading
LVA-technology: Can authorities afford the bluff?
Combating fraud with fiction To combat fraud, authorities and insurance companies in the UK invested public funds in voice-based lie-detectors to discourage the public from entering false claims[i]. The deterrent effect was significant and there were substantial savings as the … Continue reading
Charlatanry in forensic speech science: A problem to be taken seriously
Karin Bojs skriver i dagens DN:s nätupplaga (http://www.dn.se/DNet/jsp/polopoly.jsp?d=597&a=868300) om Anders Erikssons och min artikel ”Charlatanry in forensic speech science: A problem to be taken seriously”. I vår artikel analyserar vi principerna på vilka Nemesisco:s (http://www.nemesysco.com) bygger sin ”Voice Analysis Technology” och … Continue reading